<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gay Men and Feminism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/</link>
	<description>Gender Liberation Beyond Feminism</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 23:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: IceGiant</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-6798</link>
		<dc:creator>IceGiant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-6798</guid>
		<description>This blog is retarded. Feminism doesn't label men as oppressors. The system we live in doesn't give women much options with its limiting mental conditioning. What does that have to do with homosexuality? Homosexual males don't suffer being called "oppressors." They suffer being called "FAGGOT." And it's usually by OTHER males who are heterosexuals. Cause, as we all know, only "REAL" men are heterosexuals. According to the media (which is catered to white hetero-males) Homosexual males are (somehow) women! And since women are "not much" compared to the chauvinistic male, then gay men are MORE useless cause hetero-males can't stick them! Wow! Such "lovely logic"!! 

I should write my own blog, since clearly this one is lacking in information, logic and most importantly, common sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This blog is retarded. Feminism doesn&#8217;t label men as oppressors. The system we live in doesn&#8217;t give women much options with its limiting mental conditioning. What does that have to do with homosexuality? Homosexual males don&#8217;t suffer being called &#8220;oppressors.&#8221; They suffer being called &#8220;FAGGOT.&#8221; And it&#8217;s usually by OTHER males who are heterosexuals. Cause, as we all know, only &#8220;REAL&#8221; men are heterosexuals. According to the media (which is catered to white hetero-males) Homosexual males are (somehow) women! And since women are &#8220;not much&#8221; compared to the chauvinistic male, then gay men are MORE useless cause hetero-males can&#8217;t stick them! Wow! Such &#8220;lovely logic&#8221;!! </p>
<p>I should write my own blog, since clearly this one is lacking in information, logic and most importantly, common sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jypz</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-6794</link>
		<dc:creator>Jypz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Sep 2011 15:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-6794</guid>
		<description>Just because gay men have a female perspective does not mean that we enlarge our images towards women!... We are different and can only be seen as "gay men" nothing other!.. Point being!. We suffer more than woman! (Not by choice) yet we are associated as being feminist???.... I think the colatteral damage has been done by homophobia!... A subject with more consequences!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because gay men have a female perspective does not mean that we enlarge our images towards women!&#8230; We are different and can only be seen as &#8220;gay men&#8221; nothing other!.. Point being!. We suffer more than woman! (Not by choice) yet we are associated as being feminist???&#8230;. I think the colatteral damage has been done by homophobia!&#8230; A subject with more consequences!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelle Billing</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-6356</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelle Billing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-6356</guid>
		<description>Anti-Feminist,

Your assessment of where gay men stand is similar to mine.

I would urge you though to reconsider dividing the field into feminists and anti-feminists. There are feminists and then there are people who care equally about what's best for both sexes. Feminists may say that they care about both sexes but they only implement reforms for women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anti-Feminist,</p>
<p>Your assessment of where gay men stand is similar to mine.</p>
<p>I would urge you though to reconsider dividing the field into feminists and anti-feminists. There are feminists and then there are people who care equally about what&#8217;s best for both sexes. Feminists may say that they care about both sexes but they only implement reforms for women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Feminist</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-6355</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Feminist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 23:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-6355</guid>
		<description>I am a gay and I am quite strongly an anti-feminist, because I support true equality instead of female privileges. I also feel sympathy towards straight males who are oppressed by divorce and custody laws etc.

Most of the gays I personally know, are at least somewhat critical towards feminism or neutral towards it, but I know that some other gays are positive towards feminism. I cannot provide any statistics - and I am not even sure if anti-feminists or feminists are more common among gays. And I think this is also somewhat "context dependent". On some issues gays and many anti-feminists might agree with (some) feminists, but disagree on many others issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a gay and I am quite strongly an anti-feminist, because I support true equality instead of female privileges. I also feel sympathy towards straight males who are oppressed by divorce and custody laws etc.</p>
<p>Most of the gays I personally know, are at least somewhat critical towards feminism or neutral towards it, but I know that some other gays are positive towards feminism. I cannot provide any statistics - and I am not even sure if anti-feminists or feminists are more common among gays. And I think this is also somewhat &#8220;context dependent&#8221;. On some issues gays and many anti-feminists might agree with (some) feminists, but disagree on many others issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelle Billing</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-5939</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelle Billing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-5939</guid>
		<description>Hi Elias,

Thank you for your kind words. I'm glad you like my work.

However, I don't think "homosexual commands" are the reason for oversexualization of women. I don't even know what "homosexual commands" are.

To the extent that women are oversexualized in modern societies, I think it is related to not being allowed to express your inner femininity, and thus you exaggerate your outer attributes instead. But this is far from all women...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Elias,</p>
<p>Thank you for your kind words. I&#8217;m glad you like my work.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t think &#8220;homosexual commands&#8221; are the reason for oversexualization of women. I don&#8217;t even know what &#8220;homosexual commands&#8221; are.</p>
<p>To the extent that women are oversexualized in modern societies, I think it is related to not being allowed to express your inner femininity, and thus you exaggerate your outer attributes instead. But this is far from all women&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elias</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-5929</link>
		<dc:creator>Elias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-5929</guid>
		<description>Pelle:

You bring VERY GOOD POINTS :) 

I am VERY AMAZED that a man has the guts to speak like this :)


My question is:

Do you think that the OVERSEXUALIZATION OF WOMEN this era are due to homosexual commands????

Do you understand my point?????



I just watched "Sex and The City 2" and it is just PARANOIC to see how Mr. Big gives Carrie a ring for cheating on him :00000000


Thank you Pelle :)


E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pelle:</p>
<p>You bring VERY GOOD POINTS <img src='http://www.pellebilling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I am VERY AMAZED that a man has the guts to speak like this <img src='http://www.pellebilling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>My question is:</p>
<p>Do you think that the OVERSEXUALIZATION OF WOMEN this era are due to homosexual commands????</p>
<p>Do you understand my point?????</p>
<p>I just watched &#8220;Sex and The City 2&#8243; and it is just PARANOIC to see how Mr. Big gives Carrie a ring for cheating on him :00000000</p>
<p>Thank you Pelle <img src='http://www.pellebilling.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Boradben</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-3030</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Boradben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 07:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-3030</guid>
		<description>Please don't call me an oppressor... The male gender isn't the culprit, the culprit is what the male gender has installed, as values in society. It's like calling me an oppressive racist just because I'm white. So I'm therefore also oppressing jews...
Oh and you're wrong. Gay men shouldn't be feminists. Every fucking one should be a feminist, no specifics.
I consider myself a feminist, a vehement one at that, and I'm gay but I always wondered whether I would be one if I were straight... Oh and you got it wrong people, gay men, on average are more feminist than straight men. 1) They are more open minded. 2) They know about gender roles. 3) Our relationship to women is more equal, friend-like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please don&#8217;t call me an oppressor&#8230; The male gender isn&#8217;t the culprit, the culprit is what the male gender has installed, as values in society. It&#8217;s like calling me an oppressive racist just because I&#8217;m white. So I&#8217;m therefore also oppressing jews&#8230;<br />
Oh and you&#8217;re wrong. Gay men shouldn&#8217;t be feminists. Every fucking one should be a feminist, no specifics.<br />
I consider myself a feminist, a vehement one at that, and I&#8217;m gay but I always wondered whether I would be one if I were straight&#8230; Oh and you got it wrong people, gay men, on average are more feminist than straight men. 1) They are more open minded. 2) They know about gender roles. 3) Our relationship to women is more equal, friend-like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-2584</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-2584</guid>
		<description>"It is a group that literally has no need for women or to interact with them in any way.'

The ultimate MGTOWs. I once saw - it must have been ten or more years ago - an article in a major women's magazine in the US - Cosmo? - in which the writer "wondered" if all this gay stuff was just a misogynist ploy on the part of men to evade women's rightful sexual power. I am sure this writer thought of herself as a feminist and equally sure that masses of feminists would have flayed her alive for such a heretical or maybe just impolitic contention - good for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is a group that literally has no need for women or to interact with them in any way.&#8217;</p>
<p>The ultimate MGTOWs. I once saw - it must have been ten or more years ago - an article in a major women&#8217;s magazine in the US - Cosmo? - in which the writer &#8220;wondered&#8221; if all this gay stuff was just a misogynist ploy on the part of men to evade women&#8217;s rightful sexual power. I am sure this writer thought of herself as a feminist and equally sure that masses of feminists would have flayed her alive for such a heretical or maybe just impolitic contention - good for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-2583</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-2583</guid>
		<description>I've always thought, that gay men were at least theoretically the ulitimate anti-feminist group.  It is a group that literally has no need for women or to interact with them in any way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always thought, that gay men were at least theoretically the ulitimate anti-feminist group.  It is a group that literally has no need for women or to interact with them in any way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pelle Billing</title>
		<link>http://www.pellebilling.com/2009/07/gay-men-and-feminism/comment-page-1/#comment-1575</link>
		<dc:creator>Pelle Billing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pellebilling.com/?p=1365#comment-1575</guid>
		<description>@unomi
"Deva,

Your idea of “responsibility” seems more akin to “collective guilt and punishment”.

Do you also think that all straight people, including women, should be “taking responsibility” for the stoning of gay people in Iran, even if they don’t agree with it?

And why all the talk about the past? Let’s focus on what is happening here and now."

Very well put, unomi.


@Paddan

That's a very balanced take on things. We need more perspectives that's for sure. A main problem with postmodern feminists is that they absolutize their own perspective. If they were open to the whole range of perspectives, then I think that people would be more willing to take a look at the partial truth that they are bringing to the table.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@unomi<br />
&#8220;Deva,</p>
<p>Your idea of “responsibility” seems more akin to “collective guilt and punishment”.</p>
<p>Do you also think that all straight people, including women, should be “taking responsibility” for the stoning of gay people in Iran, even if they don’t agree with it?</p>
<p>And why all the talk about the past? Let’s focus on what is happening here and now.&#8221;</p>
<p>Very well put, unomi.</p>
<p>@Paddan</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a very balanced take on things. We need more perspectives that&#8217;s for sure. A main problem with postmodern feminists is that they absolutize their own perspective. If they were open to the whole range of perspectives, then I think that people would be more willing to take a look at the partial truth that they are bringing to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

